Bhagavad Gita 1.36 — What Joy Can Come from Killing the Sons of Dhritarashtra?

निहत्य धार्तराष्ट्रान्नः का प्रीतिः स्याज्जनार्दन ।
पापमेवाश्रयेदस्मान्हत्वैतानाततायिनः ॥ १.३६ ॥

O Janardana, what joy would be ours by killing the sons of Dhritarashtra? Only sin would cling to us if we kill these aggressors.

Transliteration (IAST)

nihatya dhārtarāṣhṭrān naḥ kā prītiḥ syāj janārdana |
pāpam evāśhrayed asmān hatvaitān ātatāyinaḥ || 1.36 ||

Word Separation

The Sanskrit verse is separated into individual words (Padched) for easier study.

nihatya dhārtarāṣhṭrān naḥ
kā prītiḥ syāt janārdana |
pāpam eva āśhrayet asmān
hatvā etān ātatāyinaḥ ||

Word Meanings

Line 1
Sanskrit Word Meaning
nihatya having killed
dhārtarāṣhṭrān the sons of Dhritarashtra
naḥ to us
kā what
prītiḥ joy, pleasure
syāt would there be
janārdana O Janardana (Krishna)
Line 2
Sanskrit Word Meaning
pāpam sin
eva only
āśhrayet would cling to, take shelter in
asmān us
hatvā having killed
etān these
ātatāyinaḥ aggressors, felons
Line 1 Line 2
Sanskrit Word Meaning Sanskrit Word Meaning
nihatya having killed pāpam sin
dhārtarāṣhṭrān the sons of Dhritarashtra eva only
naḥ to us āśhrayet would cling to, take shelter in
kā what asmān us
prītiḥ joy, pleasure hatvā having killed
syāt would there be etān these
janārdana O Janardana (Krishna) ātatāyinaḥ aggressors, felons

Detailed Meaning

Introduction

Arjuna asks what happiness could come to the Pāṇḍavas from killing Dhṛtarāṣṭra's sons. He adds that even though they are aggressors, killing them would bring sin upon the Pāṇḍavas. This verse brings to a close the first part of his argument and introduces the idea of <em>pāpa</em>, sin or moral fault.

Essence

This verse is the end of Arjuna's emotional appeal and the start of his moral reasoning.

A. Nihatya dhārtarāṣṭrān naḥ kā prītiḥ syāj janārdana (what joy would be ours, O Janārdana, after killing the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra?)

The word prīti means joy or delight. Arjuna asks what satisfaction a victory could bring. He addresses Krishna as Janārdana, a name that is traditionally understood as the one to whom people turn for their welfare. It is an appropriate title for one who is being asked a heartfelt question.

B. Pāpam evāśrayed asmān hatvaitān ātatāyinaḥ (sin alone would cling to us, having killed these aggressors)

The word ātatāyin refers to an aggressor. In traditional law texts, certain wrongdoers, such as one who sets fire to a house, administers poison, attacks with a weapon, steals wealth, seizes land or abducts another's spouse, were regarded as ātatāyins, and killing them in self-defence was considered permissible. Arjuna acknowledges that the Kauravas fit this description, since they have wronged the Pāṇḍavas in several of these ways. Yet he says that even so, sin would attach to them if they killed their own kin.

This is an important admission. Arjuna knows the law allows the act, but his heart refuses it. He is caught between a legal permission and a moral feeling, and this tension is what he wants Krishna to help resolve.

C. The question that remains

Arjuna's question is sincere: Can an act be both permitted and wrong? The Gita will answer by turning attention from the act alone to the state of mind in which it is done. Action performed as duty, without selfish attachment to results, does not bind in the way that action performed out of greed or hatred does.

Message for Everyday Life (When the Rules and the Heart Disagree)

Sometimes we find that something is allowed, or even expected, yet it feels deeply wrong. Such moments call for honest reflection. It helps to ask: What is the real purpose of this rule? What is my own motivation? And is there wisdom beyond both the rule and my feeling that I have not yet considered? The Gita encourages us to seek that wider wisdom rather than choosing blindly between them.

Next Topic

Arjuna has said that sin would cling to them even for killing aggressors. In the next verse, he draws a conclusion from this and states that they should not kill the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, their own relatives, asking how they could be happy after killing their own people.

Hidden Messages In This Shloka

Reflect on this verse from different perspectives and see which deeper message opens up for you.

Ethical
Sin and Merit Moral Cost
Spiritual
Inner Peace Guilt
Psychological
Anticipated Guilt Hollow Victory
Philosophical
Dilemma of Justice and Compassion Aggressor and Victim
Family Life
Kinship With Enemies
Social
Justice and Revenge Social Consequence
Leadership
Responsibility for Actions Moral Burden
Humanity
Compassion for Opponents Shared Humanity
Strategic Perspective
Hollow Victory Costs of Winning
Management
Moral Hazard Consequences
Devotional Perspective
Appeal to Janardana (the one who is prayed to by people)
Narrative Perspective
Arjuna Admits the Aggression Yet Hesitates
Educational
Ethical Reasoning Complex Dilemmas
Self-Reflection
Can I Find Joy in Harming? Guilt Before Action

Wisdom Nuggets

Conscience counts the cost before the prize.

Joy cannot be built on grief.

Justice needs wisdom as much as strength.

Imagining the aftermath is part of wisdom.

Compassion can survive even toward opponents.

Hard questions have no easy answers.

True victory leaves the heart at peace.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Arjuna call the Kauravas 'ātatāyinaḥ' (aggressors)?
In the ancient law codes, an aggressor included those who set fire to homes, poison others, attack with weapons, rob wealth, or seize land and wives. The Kauravas had wronged the Pandavas in several of these ways, so Arjuna admits they fall into this group.
If they are aggressors, why does Arjuna still hesitate?
Because they are also his family. His feelings of love and compassion conflict with the sense of justice. The Gita explores how to resolve this conflict.
What is meant by 'pāpam' (sin) clinging to them?
Arjuna feels that killing relatives would burden him with moral wrong, even if the war seems justified. He is thinking about the long-term effect on his conscience.
Why is Krishna addressed as 'janārdana' (Janardana)?
The name is traditionally explained as one who is prayed to by people for their welfare. Arjuna uses it as he confides his inner conflict to Krishna.
What does this verse teach us today?
It reminds us that even when we are in the right, harming others carries a moral weight. It invites us to think about the cost of every decision to our conscience.

Explore related topics

More shlokas on the themes this verse touches: