Bhagavad Gita 1.37 — Arjuna Argues It Is Not Right to Kill His Own Kinsmen

तस्मान्नार्हा वयं हन्तुं धार्तराष्ट्रान्स्वबान्धवान् ।
स्वजनं हि कथं हत्वा सुखिनः स्याम माधव ॥ १.३७ ॥

Therefore, we are not justified in killing the sons of Dhritarashtra, our own relatives. For how, O Madhava, could we be happy after killing our own kinsmen?

Transliteration (IAST)

tasmān nārhā vayaṁ hantuṁ dhārtarāṣhṭrān sva-bāndhavān |
sva-janaṁ hi kathaṁ hatvā sukhinaḥ syāma mādhava || 1.37 ||

Word Separation

The Sanskrit verse is separated into individual words (Padched) for easier study.

tasmāt na arhāḥ vayam hantum
dhārtarāṣhṭrān svabāndhavān |
svajanam hi katham hatvā
sukhinaḥ syāma mādhava ||

Word Meanings

Line 1
Sanskrit Word Meaning
tasmāt therefore
na not
arhāḥ fit, justified
vayam we
hantum to kill
Line 2
Sanskrit Word Meaning
dhārtarāṣhṭrān the sons of Dhritarashtra
svabāndhavān our own relatives
svajanam own kinsmen
hi indeed
katham how
hatvā having killed
sukhinaḥ happy
syāma could we be
mādhava O Madhava (Krishna)
Line 1 Line 2
Sanskrit Word Meaning Sanskrit Word Meaning
tasmāt therefore dhārtarāṣhṭrān the sons of Dhritarashtra
na not svabāndhavān our own relatives
arhāḥ fit, justified svajanam own kinsmen
vayam we hi indeed
hantum to kill katham how
hatvā having killed
sukhinaḥ happy
syāma could we be
mādhava O Madhava (Krishna)

Detailed Meaning

Introduction

Arjuna now draws a firm conclusion from everything he has said so far. Since killing his own kinsmen would bring no real happiness, he declares that they should not kill the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra. He addresses Krishna as Mādhava and asks how any happiness could come from destroying one's own people.

Essence

This verse turns Arjuna's feelings into a clear decision.

A. Tasmān nārhā vayaṁ hantuṁ (therefore we are not fit to kill)

The word tasmāt, 'therefore', marks a conclusion. Arjuna has laid out his grief, his doubts and his reasons, and now he states the result. The word arhāḥ means worthy or fit. He says, in effect, 'It is not proper for us to do this.' His statement is not just about preference but about what he thinks is right.

B. Dhārtarāṣṭrān sva-bāndhavān (the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, our own relatives)

Arjuna stresses sva-bāndhavān, 'our own kinsmen'. Notice how his language has changed. Earlier he called Duryodhana durbuddhi, evil-minded. Now the same people are simply his relatives. The moral clarity that he expressed in verse 23 has been replaced by the weight of kinship.

C. Svajanaṁ hi kathaṁ hatvā sukhinaḥ syāma mādhava (how could we be happy after killing our own people, O Mādhava?)

The question is about sukha, happiness. Arjuna evaluates the war by asking whether it will bring joy. This is a revealing standard. The Gita will gradually teach that dharma is not decided by whether an act makes us happy or unhappy, but by what is right and by the spirit in which it is done.

Notice also that Arjuna calls Krishna Mādhava, the Lord of Lakṣmī, a name of good fortune. He is asking the very source of auspiciousness how such an act could bring welfare.

Message for Everyday Life (Is Happiness the Right Measure?)

We often judge our choices by how they will make us feel. This is natural, but it is not always a reliable guide. Some right actions are uncomfortable, and some pleasant actions are harmful. The Gita invites us to add another question: not only 'Will this make me happy?' but 'Is this right, and am I acting in the right spirit?'

Next Topic

Arjuna has concluded that they should not kill their relatives. In the next verse, he comments on the Kauravas' own attitude, saying that their minds are overpowered by greed and that they cannot see the fault in destroying a family.

Hidden Messages In This Shloka

Reflect on this verse from different perspectives and see which deeper message opens up for you.

Ethical
Moral Argument Justification
Spiritual
Seeking Peace Compassion
Psychological
Seeking Happiness Rationalising Reluctance
Philosophical
Happiness and Action Kinship vs Duty
Family Life
Own Relatives Family Unity
Social
Social Bonds Group Identity
Leadership
Responsibility Moral Authority
Humanity
Compassion Shared Humanity
Strategic Perspective
Conclusion of the Argument Withdrawal
Management
Conflict of Values Decision Dilemma
Devotional Perspective
Seeking Madhava's Approval
Narrative Perspective
Arjuna Concludes His First Reasoning Closing Argument
Educational
Reasoning from Premises Logic and Emotion
Self-Reflection
Is My Reasoning Complete? Seeking Happiness

Wisdom Nuggets

Ask whether your reasons are complete.

Joy must not rest on loss.

Family ties shape our conscience.

Feelings can guide or mislead.

Think again before you conclude in pain.

A sincere question deserves a sincere answer.

Ethics begins where convenience ends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Arjuna say 'na arhāḥ' (we are not justified)?
He concludes that killing relatives cannot be justified, even in a war. It is the first clear statement of his decision not to fight.
What does 'sukhinaḥ' (happy) refer to?
It refers to lasting happiness and peace of mind. Arjuna doubts that anyone could be happy after killing close relatives.
Why is Krishna called 'mādhava' (Madhava) here?
It is a name of Krishna connected to Madhu, the spring season, or to the goddess Lakshmi in different traditions. Arjuna uses it while seeking his friend's understanding.
Is Arjuna's conclusion final?
No. Krishna's teaching soon addresses it, showing that duty (dharma) must be seen in a larger context beyond personal attachment.
What can modern readers learn from this verse?
It shows how we often reach conclusions under emotional strain. It encourages us to examine whether our reasoning considers all aspects, including duty and the long-term good.

Explore related topics

More shlokas on the themes this verse touches:

Qualities Compassion Kindness