Bhagavad Gita 18.7 — Giving Up Prescribed Duty Out of Delusion Is Tāmasic
नियतस्य तु संन्यासः कर्मणो नोपपद्यते ।
मोहात्तस्य परित्यागस्तामसः परिकीर्तितः ॥ १८.७ ॥
🔊 Listen to meaning of this shloka
Current voice: —
Ready
Text-to-speech is not supported by this browser.
But renunciation of prescribed duty is not proper. Its abandonment out of delusion is declared to be tāmasic (of the nature of ignorance).
Transliteration (IAST)
Word Separation
The Sanskrit verse is separated into individual words (Padched) for easier study.
Word Meanings
| Line 1 | |
|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| niyatasya | of prescribed, of obligatory |
| tu | but |
| saṁnyāsaḥ | renunciation |
| karmaṇaḥ | of action, of duty |
| na | not |
| upapadyate | is proper, is appropriate |
| Line 2 | |
|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| mohāt | out of delusion |
| tasya | of that, of it |
| parityāgaḥ | abandonment |
| tāmasaḥ | tāmasic, of the nature of ignorance |
| parikīrtitaḥ | is declared |
| Line 1 | Line 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning | Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| niyatasya | of prescribed, of obligatory | mohāt | out of delusion |
| tu | but | tasya | of that, of it |
| saṁnyāsaḥ | renunciation | parityāgaḥ | abandonment |
| karmaṇaḥ | of action, of duty | tāmasaḥ | tāmasic, of the nature of ignorance |
| na | not | parikīrtitaḥ | is declared |
| upapadyate | is proper, is appropriate | ||
Detailed Meaning
Introduction
Here Lord Krishna begins describing the three kinds of renunciation, starting with the lowest. He says that giving up one's prescribed duty is never appropriate, and that abandoning it out of delusion is <em>tāmasic</em>.
Essence
When renunciation is really confusion
Lord Krishna now applies the threefold classification He announced earlier. He begins with tāmasa tyāga, renunciation influenced by tamas, the quality of darkness and inertia.
Niyata karma (prescribed, obligatory duty): These are the responsibilities that naturally belong to a person according to their role, station, and circumstances. A parent's care for children, a teacher's teaching, and a professional's honest work are examples. Such duties are the ground on which spiritual growth takes place.
Na upapadyate (it is not proper): Lord Krishna says plainly that it is not fitting to renounce these. One cannot gain spiritual maturity by dropping the very responsibilities through which maturity is built.
Mohāt parityāgaḥ (abandonment out of delusion): When a person gives up duty because of confusion, mistaken ideas, or a failure to see what is truly right, the act is tāmasic. It may even be dressed in spiritual language. But it has no clarity behind it.
The look-alike problem
Tamas often disguises itself as detachment. A person who avoids responsibility out of laziness may say, I am above all this. Someone who walks away from commitments out of confusion may call it freedom. Lord Krishna cuts through such disguises. The test is not what the renunciation looks like, but where it comes from.
Message for Everyday Life (Avoiding Responsibility in the Name of Peace)
There is a modern form of this verse. Neglecting studies, work, or family because nothing really matters is not wisdom.
Ask honestly: Am I stepping back because I have understood something, or because I do not want to face something? A duty ignored does not disappear. It returns, usually in a heavier form.
When renunciation is really confusion
Lord Krishna now applies the threefold classification He announced earlier. He begins with tāmasa tyāga, renunciation influenced by tamas, the quality of darkness and inertia.
Niyata karma (prescribed, obligatory duty): These are the responsibilities that naturally belong to a person according to their role, station, and circumstances. A parent's care for children, a teacher's teaching, and a professional's honest work are examples. Such duties are the ground on which spiritual growth takes place.
Na upapadyate (it is not proper): Lord Krishna says plainly that it is not fitting to renounce these. One cannot gain spiritual maturity by dropping the very responsibilities through which maturity is built.
Mohāt parityāgaḥ (abandonment out of delusion): When a person gives up duty because of confusion, mistaken ideas, or a failure to see what is truly right, the act is tāmasic. It may even be dressed in spiritual language. But it has no clarity behind it.
The look-alike problem
Tamas often disguises itself as detachment. A person who avoids responsibility out of laziness may say, I am above all this. Someone who walks away from commitments out of confusion may call it freedom. Lord Krishna cuts through such disguises. The test is not what the renunciation looks like, but where it comes from.
Message for Everyday Life (Avoiding Responsibility in the Name of Peace)
There is a modern form of this verse. Neglecting studies, work, or family because nothing really matters is not wisdom.
Ask honestly: Am I stepping back because I have understood something, or because I do not want to face something? A duty ignored does not disappear. It returns, usually in a heavier form.
Next Topic
Lord Krishna has described the renunciation born of delusion. In the next verse, He turns to a different kind of renunciation, one that arises not from confusion but from the wish to avoid pain and effort.
Hidden Messages In This Shloka
Reflect on this verse from different perspectives and see which deeper message opens up for you.
Wisdom Nuggets
Escaping a duty rarely ends the duty.
Not every retreat is a spiritual advance.
Delusion mistakes avoidance for freedom.
Facing what must be done is a form of strength.
Ask yourself why you are leaving, not just what you are leaving.
Commitments kept build quiet character.
The way out of inertia is through right action.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is meant by 'niyatam karma' (prescribed duty)?
Does this verse condemn all 'saṁnyāsa' (renunciation)?
What is 'moha' (delusion) in this context?
What does 'tāmasa' (of the nature of ignorance) mean?
What is the practical message of this verse in one sentence?
Explore related topics
More shlokas on the themes this verse touches: