Bhagavad Gita 18.8 — Giving Up Duty Out of Fear of Discomfort Is Rājasic
दुःखमित्येव यत्कर्म कायक्लेशभयात्त्यजेत् ।
स कृत्वा राजसं त्यागं नैव त्यागफलं लभेत् ॥ १८.८ ॥
🔊 Listen to meaning of this shloka
Current voice: —
Ready
Text-to-speech is not supported by this browser.
One who gives up an action thinking, 'It is painful,' out of fear of bodily discomfort, performs a rājasic (passion-driven) relinquishment and does not obtain the fruit of relinquishment.
Transliteration (IAST)
Word Separation
The Sanskrit verse is separated into individual words (Padched) for easier study.
Word Meanings
| Line 1 | |
|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| duḥkham | painful, troublesome |
| iti | thus |
| eva | only |
| yat | which |
| karma | action |
| kāyakleśhabhayāt | out of fear of bodily discomfort |
| tyajet | one gives up |
| Line 2 | |
|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| saḥ | that person |
| kṛtvā | having done, having performed |
| rājasam | rājasic, born of passion and restlessness |
| tyāgam | relinquishment |
| na | not |
| eva | at all |
| tyāgaphalam | the fruit of relinquishment |
| labhet | would obtain |
| Line 1 | Line 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanskrit Word | Meaning | Sanskrit Word | Meaning |
| duḥkham | painful, troublesome | saḥ | that person |
| iti | thus | kṛtvā | having done, having performed |
| eva | only | rājasam | rājasic, born of passion and restlessness |
| yat | which | tyāgam | relinquishment |
| karma | action | na | not |
| kāyakleśhabhayāt | out of fear of bodily discomfort | eva | at all |
| tyajet | one gives up | tyāgaphalam | the fruit of relinquishment |
| labhet | would obtain | ||
Detailed Meaning
Introduction
In this verse, Lord Krishna describes <em>rājasic</em> renunciation. When a person gives up a duty only because it is painful or because they fear bodily discomfort, the renunciation is driven by <em>rajas</em> and does not bring the true fruit of <em>tyāga</em>.
Essence
Renunciation that comes from avoiding discomfort
Having described the tāmasic form, Lord Krishna now describes the second type. Here the person is not confused but uncomfortable, and the discomfort becomes the reason for leaving the duty.
Duḥkham ity eva (because it is painful): The person thinks of the duty only as a source of suffering. It is tiring, difficult, or unpleasant, and so it is dropped.
Kāya-kleśa-bhayāt (from fear of bodily trouble): The fear here is of physical strain and effort. It points to the preference for comfort, which is a mark of rajas, the quality that seeks pleasure and avoids hardship.
Naiva tyāga-phalaṁ labhet (he does not obtain the fruit of renunciation): This is the heart of the verse. Such a person may have left the duty behind, but has not received the benefit of renunciation, which is inner freedom and purity of mind. The attachment to comfort is still intact. Only the duty has been abandoned.
Why this is not true tyāga
Real tyāga gives up attachment, but this person has given up the duty while keeping the attachment. In fact, the attachment to ease has grown stronger. Nothing inside has been purified, so no fruit of renunciation can come.
Message for Everyday Life (When Difficulty Disguises Itself as Wisdom)
It is common to avoid a demanding task by calling it not for me, or not worth the stress. Sometimes that judgment may be sound, but often it is simply the wish for comfort.
A helpful distinction: Ask whether you are leaving because something is truly wrong, or only because it is hard. Growth usually lives on the far side of the difficulty. Giving up every demanding duty will leave us comfortable, but not free.
Renunciation that comes from avoiding discomfort
Having described the tāmasic form, Lord Krishna now describes the second type. Here the person is not confused but uncomfortable, and the discomfort becomes the reason for leaving the duty.
Duḥkham ity eva (because it is painful): The person thinks of the duty only as a source of suffering. It is tiring, difficult, or unpleasant, and so it is dropped.
Kāya-kleśa-bhayāt (from fear of bodily trouble): The fear here is of physical strain and effort. It points to the preference for comfort, which is a mark of rajas, the quality that seeks pleasure and avoids hardship.
Naiva tyāga-phalaṁ labhet (he does not obtain the fruit of renunciation): This is the heart of the verse. Such a person may have left the duty behind, but has not received the benefit of renunciation, which is inner freedom and purity of mind. The attachment to comfort is still intact. Only the duty has been abandoned.
Why this is not true tyāga
Real tyāga gives up attachment, but this person has given up the duty while keeping the attachment. In fact, the attachment to ease has grown stronger. Nothing inside has been purified, so no fruit of renunciation can come.
Message for Everyday Life (When Difficulty Disguises Itself as Wisdom)
It is common to avoid a demanding task by calling it not for me, or not worth the stress. Sometimes that judgment may be sound, but often it is simply the wish for comfort.
A helpful distinction: Ask whether you are leaving because something is truly wrong, or only because it is hard. Growth usually lives on the far side of the difficulty. Giving up every demanding duty will leave us comfortable, but not free.
Next Topic
Lord Krishna has shown that giving up duty from confusion or from fear of effort is not true renunciation. In the next verse, He describes the highest type, the <em>sāttvic tyāga</em>, in which duty is performed and attachment is given up.
Hidden Messages In This Shloka
Reflect on this verse from different perspectives and see which deeper message opens up for you.
Wisdom Nuggets
Comfort is a poor guide to what is right.
Doing what is hard for the right reason builds character.
Fear in disguise is still fear.
Difficulty passes; neglected duty lingers.
Real renunciation frees; fearful avoidance only shifts the burden.
Doing what you must is easier than regretting what you skipped.
The right to rest does not include the right to escape.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'rājasa' (passion-driven) mean here?
Does this mean one should never avoid anything that is physically hard or harmful?
Why does such a person not obtain 'tyāgaphalam' (the fruit of relinquishment)?
What does 'kāyakleśha' (bodily discomfort) include?
What is the practical message of this verse in one sentence?
Explore related topics
More shlokas on the themes this verse touches: